Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36013

in Cecil, AlabamaPopulation 245

61.22/ 100

Ranked #3,993 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.5%)

Ranked #16 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 2.6%)

Ranked #2 of 41 Montgomery, AL ZIPs (top 4.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$174,659

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

0.76%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

51.5%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.6%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

142.8 days/year

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

12.4 mi

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In overall standing, Cecil, Alabama (ZIP 36013) comes out in the top 12.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,993rd) and the top 2.6% of Alabama (16th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: household income resides in the top 2.0% nationally, modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and poverty lies at the national minimum. Homeownership sits at the national maximum, home broadband subscription settles at the national maximum, and modeled mammography registers in the top 2.9% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Set against that, floodplain exposure lands in the top 3.7% nationally, and modeled humid heat is in the top 6.6% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides in the top 7.5% nationally.

In plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 36064, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Montgomery, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.5%26.3–33.0
High blood pressure among adults40.3%36.3–44.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.2–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.6–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.2–6.0
Depression among adults21.4%18.2–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.3–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.4%36.3–44.7
Obesity among adults37.8%31.9–44.2
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.3–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.0–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%76.8–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.3–86.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.2–92.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.6%68.7–76.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.9%67.7–74.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.6%77.1–87.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.3–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.4%7.5–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.6%16.2–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%30.5–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.8%12.5–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults13.4%11.6–15.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.0%9.5–12.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.8%9.1–12.6
Any disability among adults27.2%23.3–31.7
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.0–6.6
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.2–7.0
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.1–14.0
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%17.4–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.3–11.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.0–6.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.4–9.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.4–6.1
Loneliness among adults30.9%26.3–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.3–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)55.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households57.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+11.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age42.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$174,659$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$434,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured