Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36736

in Dixons Mills, AlabamaPopulation 1,559

32.18/ 100

Ranked #30,274 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.6%)

Ranked #565 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 8.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

24%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.8%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

56.9%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.7%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

27.2%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

35.6%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

30.1%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.8%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

46.3%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its severe level: severe means at least four of the six health-need readings and at least four of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

By its overall health score, Dixons Mills, Alabama (ZIP 36736) lands in the bottom 5.6% nationally (30,274th) and the bottom 8.8% of Alabama (565th).

continue reading

The readings that matter most locally set the tone for the profile: modeled diabetes registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and self-care disability sits in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure rests in the top 0.5% nationally, and stroke is in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 1.5% nationally, fair or poor health settles in the top 2.3% nationally, and tooth loss lies in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled vision disability resides in the top 3.5% nationally, independent living disability lands in the top 2.9% nationally, and short sleep registers in the top 1.8% nationally.

Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 36782, just across the boundary. On a broader view, the area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 94.5 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 2.1 (bottom 10%) — 92 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #63 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.5%32.7–40.3
High blood pressure among adults56.9%52.5–61.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.5–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.6%9.8–13.5
Depression among adults21.4%18.0–25.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.0%21.1–26.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.8%40.1–49.5
Obesity among adults48.4%40.1–56.9
Stroke among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years30.1%25.3–35.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.3%10.8–17.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.6%79.1–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.7%80.7–86.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%83.9–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.7%57.4–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.6%43.5–51.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%70.7–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.1%8.2–12.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.6%17.8–25.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.1%33.8–46.1
Short sleep duration among adults46.3%39.0–53.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults35.6%30.7–40.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%16.5–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults18.5%16.0–21.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.1%17.2–23.0
Any disability among adults46.2%40.2–51.6
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Independent living disability among adults14.8%12.7–16.9
Mobility disability among adults27.2%23.3–30.8
Self-care disability among adults8.8%7.4–10.1
Vision disability among adults10.7%9.2–12.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.0%28.0–38.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults37.5%31.5–43.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults33.3%27.7–39.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.3%21.9–30.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.6%14.9–20.7
Loneliness among adults39.8%33.9–46.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.7%16.8–22.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate32.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6414.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)47.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle12.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription72.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households60.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+19.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age31.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$55,759$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$109,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 1.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured