Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35136

in Rockford, AlabamaPopulation 1,755

45.20/ 100

Ranked #22,194 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #235 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

49.3%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.7%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

45.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

75.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.3%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.7%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.0%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.5%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Rockford, Alabama (ZIP 35136) sits in the bottom 31% nationally (22,194th) and the top 38% of Alabama (235th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 2.1% nationally, recreation stands in the top 5.4% nationally, and modeled tree cover resides in the top 6.6% nationally. Housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 7.5% nationally. On the other hand, modeled high blood pressure stands in the top 4.1% nationally, and high cholesterol resides in the top 3.2% nationally. Fatal road crashes sits in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled diabetes stands in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled hearing disability resides in the top 10.1% nationally, and humid heat sits in the top 10.7% nationally.

Put plainly, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 35046, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 84.5; chronic-disease standing 9.6 (bottom 10%) — 75 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #768 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.8%33.9–41.7
High blood pressure among adults49.3%44.5–53.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–11.9
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.8–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.8%9.3–12.4
Depression among adults23.1%19.5–26.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.7%15.4–20.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.7%40.7–50.4
Obesity among adults40.5%31.8–49.3
Stroke among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.6%13.4–20.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.0–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.5%79.8–84.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%78.9–85.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.2–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%62.9–72.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.8%53.6–61.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%68.4–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.1–15.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%14.7–20.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.7%26.4–36.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.3%30.2–44.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.1%22.5–29.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.5–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.9%14.8–19.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.2–18.3
Any disability among adults40.8%35.7–45.6
Hearing disability among adults10.9%9.6–12.2
Independent living disability among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Mobility disability among adults21.5%18.7–24.4
Self-care disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.4%20.7–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.8%15.1–20.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.0–15.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.2–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.8–10.2
Loneliness among adults33.3%28.0–38.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.2–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6410.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)9.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription86.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate86.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households56.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+30.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age52.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$50,114$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$140,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$603$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.55 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured