Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34982

in Fort Pierce, FloridaPopulation 31,143

46.06/ 100

Ranked #21,288 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #713 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #17 of 21 Port St. Lucie, FL ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

87%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.5%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

320 units

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

40.6%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US90th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Park land

13.3%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 34982, one of several in Fort Pierce, Florida ranks in the bottom 34% nationally (21,288th) and the bottom 27% of Florida (713th).

continue reading

Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: modeled pfas stands in the top 0.8% nationally, and uninsured sits in the top 4.9% nationally. Housing-cost burden resides in the top 9.4% nationally, and modeled disaster risk stands in the top 9.7% nationally. Crowded housing sits in the top 11.8% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Park land resides in the top 9.7% nationally, and distance to an emergency room stands in the bottom 11.5% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 34949, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Port St. Lucie, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.6 ± 1.2 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.6 years — 2.0 years below them.

    Ranked #1,562 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 82.8; chronic-disease standing 27.8 — 55 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,113 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.6%27.7–33.4
High blood pressure among adults40.1%36.6–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.0–10.7
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Depression among adults18.8%16.2–21.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.6–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%36.8–44.3
Obesity among adults33.1%27.8–38.6
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.1%15.2–21.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.5%17.4–21.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%76.4–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.5%73.3–79.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.6–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%59.6–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.5%47.0–53.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%66.0–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.5–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%14.6–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.5%26.8–34.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%32.2–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.2%22.6–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.6–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%15.7–19.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%15.2–18.7
Any disability among adults37.5%33.9–41.5
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Mobility disability among adults19.2%17.3–21.4
Self-care disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.1
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.2–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6426.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)18.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate72.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population15.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households53.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+24.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age39.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$54,082$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$262,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,296$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.63 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured