Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39735

in Ackerman, MississippiPopulation 3,587

43.93/ 100

Ranked #23,481 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #138 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

6.3%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.26 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

12.2%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.51 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47.3%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST45th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

132.2 days/year

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

63%

in the top 13.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

3.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ackerman, Mississippi (ZIP 39735), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 27% nationally (23,481st) and the top 34% of Mississippi (138th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled pfas registers in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and mental-health providers lands in the top 2.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Outpatient lies in the top 7.5% nationally, and modeled binge drinking settles in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Fiber broadband stands in the top 10.5% nationally, and modeled tree cover is in the top 13.1% nationally. Working the other way, unemployment rests in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure sits in the top 7.1% nationally. Modeled humid heat registers in the top 9.4% nationally.

In everyday language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 39750, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 91.0 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 17.9 — 73 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #875 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.4%29.8–37.0
High blood pressure among adults47.3%43.0–51.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Depression among adults19.8%16.6–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.7%14.6–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.5%36.6–46.0
Obesity among adults41.3%33.1–49.3
Stroke among adults5.1%4.6–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.7%17.2–24.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%9.4–13.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.9%79.3–84.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%78.7–84.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.3–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%54.8–65.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults8.4%7.1–9.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%65.2–80.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.4%9.9–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.2%15.6–20.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.4%30.2–40.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%31.2–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.5%22.3–28.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.8–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.9–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.6%15.5–19.8
Any disability among adults40.0%35.2–44.8
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
Independent living disability among adults10.8%9.5–12.0
Mobility disability among adults20.7%18.2–23.2
Self-care disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.2
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.1%24.1–32.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.5%18.5–24.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.8–15.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.5%13.3–17.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Loneliness among adults35.1%30.1–40.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.3%9.0–11.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6415.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)13.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)12.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle6.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription79.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate69.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households40.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+21.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age42.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$51,820$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$147,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$616$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.0 yr ± 1.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 74.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured