Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

86432

in Littlefield, ArizonaPopulation 3,073

38.32/ 100

Ranked #27,833 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.3%)

Ranked #320 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #17 of 24 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

60.3%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

126.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

13.5%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.0%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

161 mi

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.2%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.4%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

79.5 days/year

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18.1 per million

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Littlefield, Arizona (ZIP 86432) comes out in the bottom 13.3% nationally (27,833rd) and the bottom 19% of Arizona (320th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled mammography settles in the bottom 0.8% nationally, fatal road crashes registers in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 1.8% nationally, modeled stroke is in the top 3.2% nationally, and walkability resides in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Modeled mobility disability rests in the top 4.3% nationally, and extreme heat lies in the top 5.0% nationally. More encouragingly, distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 6.7% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, fatal road crashes runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 84737, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.7%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 99.3 (top 1%); chronic-disease standing 4.8 (bottom 10%) — 95 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #32 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.8%33.7–39.9
High blood pressure among adults46.2%42.7–49.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.0%11.8–14.2
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults12.0%10.6–13.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.8%12.1–15.8
Depression among adults18.9%16.4–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.8%14.8–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.8%41.2–48.5
Obesity among adults34.0%29.2–39.2
Stroke among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.3%17.2–23.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.9%14.5–19.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.4–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.4%73.3–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%85.0–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.8%53.1–62.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.9%45.4–52.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years60.3%52.8–66.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.3%10.4–14.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%15.3–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.3%29.8–38.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%34.5–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.5%24.1–31.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.4–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.8%16.6–21.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.1%14.3–18.1
Any disability among adults42.9%38.6–47.0
Hearing disability among adults13.5%12.0–14.9
Independent living disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Mobility disability among adults24.4%21.5–27.4
Self-care disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Vision disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.3%24.9–32.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.3–22.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.1%12.6–17.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.7–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Loneliness among adults30.0%26.2–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.0–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6440.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)20.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)7.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription74.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate82.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population14.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households75.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+39.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age61.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$48,627$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$249,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$914$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 1.4378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.43 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured