Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34986

in Port Saint Lucie, FloridaPopulation 30,715

61.60/ 100

Ranked #3,752 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.8%)

Ranked #142 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 14.6%)

Ranked #3 of 21 Port St. Lucie, FL ZIPs (top 14.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

197.6 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

548 units

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.9%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 34986, one of several in Port Saint Lucie, Florida sits in the top 11.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,752nd) and the top 14.6% of Florida (142nd).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: dental providers settles in the top 2.8% nationally, floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum, and physicians is in the top 3.5% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 4.0% nationally, modeled obesity sits in the bottom 8.9% nationally, and recreation registers in the top 7.2% nationally. Grocery lands in the top 7.3% nationally, and mental-health providers resides in the top 7.8% nationally. Working the other way, modeled humid heat lies in the top 0.6% nationally, and disaster risk settles in the top 4.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 34987, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Port St. Lucie, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.0 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $80,047 predicts 79.2 years — 3.8 years above.

    Ranked #224 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.0 ± 1.4 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.4 years — 3.6 years above them.

    Ranked #506 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%29.6–36.1
High blood pressure among adults41.1%37.3–44.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.4%12.3–14.6
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Depression among adults15.6%13.3–18.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.8–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.7%39.8–47.6
Obesity among adults26.9%22.1–32.0
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.6%6.1–9.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.0%10.5–13.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.3%80.8–85.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%78.8–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults91.5%90.5–92.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.3%69.2–77.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.9–67.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%70.9–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.1%10.1–14.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.8%8.4–11.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%19.5–26.4
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%27.6–37.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.2%15.0–19.6
Frequent mental distress among adults13.4%11.9–14.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.2–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.7–12.3
Any disability among adults31.1%27.5–34.8
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Mobility disability among adults15.5%13.5–17.6
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6411.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)7.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)9.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription93.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate84.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population15.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households70.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+37.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age57.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$80,047$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$408,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,713$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.0 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 83.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured