Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38847

in Golden, MississippiPopulation 3,388

44.91/ 100

Ranked #22,505 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #119 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

69.6%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST20th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

54.9 mi

in the top 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

32.5%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

Golden, Mississippi (ZIP 38847) ranks in the bottom 30% nationally (22,505th) and the top 29% of Mississippi (119th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 10.3% nationally. Fiber broadband settles in the top 13.1% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 13.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands in the bottom 16% nationally. By contrast, home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 6.0% nationally, modeled humid heat rests in the top 13.5% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 11.1% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 12.3% nationally, and hearing disability rests in the top 15% nationally.

For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 38827, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 84.6; chronic-disease standing 26.0 — 59 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,846 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.2%31.1–37.5
High blood pressure among adults44.1%40.3–47.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.3–11.0
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Depression among adults21.4%18.5–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.5–16.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.9%38.9–46.8
Obesity among adults37.5%31.1–44.1
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.1%12.8–17.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%9.0–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.4–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.4–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%84.8–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.3%54.8–63.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults8.7%7.6–10.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.5%63.2–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%12.0–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%15.2–20.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.3%29.8–39.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%27.6–37.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.5%20.7–26.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.2–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.5–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%15.6–19.8
Any disability among adults39.1%34.8–43.3
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.3–11.5
Independent living disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Mobility disability among adults19.6%17.4–22.0
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.1%21.8–28.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.0%13.5–18.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.0–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.6–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.7–10.0
Loneliness among adults34.1%29.6–38.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–648.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)15.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription69.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate79.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households47.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age33.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$50,353$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$115,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$768$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.6 yr ± 1.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.69 years of 76.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured