Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33981

in Port Charlotte, FloridaPopulation 15,622

52.96/ 100

Ranked #12,146 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #472 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #7 of 13 Punta Gorda, FL ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

208.3 days/year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

90.5%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Park land

40.3%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.5%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

9.6 ppb

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.06%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

48.7 mi

in the top 13.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

90.7%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

ZIP 33981, one of several in Port Charlotte, Florida ranks in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,146th) and the top 48% of Florida (472nd).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: park land lies in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 3.5% nationally. Modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 7.5% nationally, and colon screening lies in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled humid heat registers in the top 0.3% nationally, floodplain exposure lies in the top 0.6% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol is in the top 2.1% nationally. Lead in tap water registers in the top 3.7% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water lies in the top 10.7% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 33921, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Punta Gorda, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.1 ± 2.5 years. A median household income of $84,098 predicts 79.4 years — 2.8 years above.

    Ranked #530 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 94.8 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 19.4 — 75 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #741 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.9%34.8–41.2
High blood pressure among adults43.7%40.4–47.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.0%12.8–15.3
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.2–10.7
Depression among adults17.0%14.8–19.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%13.2–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.5%43.0–50.2
Obesity among adults30.7%26.5–35.5
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.2%9.3–13.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%8.0–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.2%80.7–85.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.9%80.4–85.4
Cholesterol screening among adults91.1%90.0–92.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.8%70.0–77.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.4%60.4–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%69.5–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.4–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.2%11.1–15.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.3%20.1–27.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.8%28.7–36.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%16.4–21.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%13.0–16.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.8–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
Any disability among adults32.9%29.4–36.7
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.9–11.1
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.5
Mobility disability among adults16.9%14.9–19.3
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6413.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate90.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population7.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households78.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+42.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age61.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$84,098$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$386,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,311$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.1 yr ± 1.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.28 years of 82.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured