Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33955

in Punta Gorda, FloridaPopulation 12,399

55.97/ 100

Ranked #8,305 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #334 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #3 of 13 Punta Gorda, FL ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

211.1 days/year

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

47.9%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

76.4%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

7.8 ppb

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US95th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.7%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

60.4 mi

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.1%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.8%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

45.8%

in the top 10.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 33955, one of several in Punta Gorda, Florida lands in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,305th) and the top 34% of Florida (334th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled colon screening resides in the top 1.5% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 5.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and cognitive disability lands in the bottom 8.9% nationally. Set against that, modeled humid heat lies in the top 0.2% nationally, and high cholesterol stands in the top 0.9% nationally. Lead in tap water rests in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease registers in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled hearing disability resides in the top 10.1% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. On the overall standing, ZIP 33950, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Punta Gorda, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 90.0 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 15.2 — 75 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #773 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.3%36.7–42.1
High blood pressure among adults45.8%42.9–48.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults16.0%15.0–17.2
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.4–10.2
Coronary heart disease among adults10.7%9.8–11.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.3–10.5
Depression among adults15.7%13.9–17.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.2%13.7–16.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened47.9%45.0–50.9
Obesity among adults29.0%25.4–32.9
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.6–11.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%8.5–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.7%82.8–86.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.4%82.4–86.3
Cholesterol screening among adults92.2%91.3–93.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years76.4%73.4–79.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.8%63.2–68.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.0%72.2–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.1%10.5–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.5%10.0–13.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.1%20.5–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.9%27.7–34.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%16.3–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults13.0%11.7–14.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.6–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Any disability among adults33.2%30.3–36.5
Hearing disability among adults10.9%10.0–12.0
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.5–8.1
Mobility disability among adults17.2%15.4–19.3
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6422.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)14.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription90.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate90.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households81.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+41.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age60.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$76,943$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$376,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,375$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured