Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33950

in Punta Gorda, FloridaPopulation 24,955

56.48/ 100

Ranked #7,784 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #310 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #2 of 13 Punta Gorda, FL ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

50.2%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

87.5%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.1%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

77.8%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.4%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.4%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

547 units

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

49%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 33950, one of several in Punta Gorda, Florida lands in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,784th) and the top 32% of Florida (310th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled colon screening registers in the top 0.7% nationally, modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 4.0% nationally. Recreation is in the top 4.7% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Set against that, modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 0.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 1.6% nationally, and hearing disability rests in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure registers in the top 4.5% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. On the overall standing, ZIP 33946, about 7.7 miles away, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Punta Gorda, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 91.2 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 7.3 (bottom 10%) — 84 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #324 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults43.1%39.8–46.5
High blood pressure among adults49.0%45.4–52.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults17.6%16.3–19.2
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults12.1%10.9–13.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Depression among adults15.3%13.2–17.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.7%14.8–18.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened50.2%46.6–54.0
Obesity among adults29.1%24.9–33.6
Stroke among adults5.4%5.0–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.9%9.1–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%8.2–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure86.6%84.4–88.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults86.4%84.3–88.4
Cholesterol screening among adults93.4%92.6–94.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years77.8%74.5–80.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.7%61.9–67.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%72.4–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.4%8.8–12.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.0%9.5–12.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.2%20.9–27.4
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%26.7–34.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%17.1–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults12.3%11.0–13.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%14.1–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.5%9.4–11.8
Any disability among adults35.5%32.0–38.9
Hearing disability among adults12.4%11.2–13.7
Independent living disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Mobility disability among adults19.4%17.2–21.6
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–649.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)38.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription93.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate82.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population7.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households80.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+50.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age65.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$76,369$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$433,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,276$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.22 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured