Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33032

in Homestead, FloridaPopulation 65,132

52.97/ 100

Ranked #12,133 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #471 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #127 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

28%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

212.1 days/year

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

2,281 units

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

56.2%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

49.5%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.66 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

55.6%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.3%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.2 mi

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.1%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Overall, ZIP 33032, one of several in Homestead, Florida lands in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,133rd) and the top 48% of Florida (471st).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 0.3% nationally, and outpatient lies in the top 4.4% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lands in the bottom 6.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled uninsured sits in the top 1.5% nationally, modeled humid heat is in the top 0.2% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the top 3.1% nationally. Housing-cost burden resides in the top 3.3% nationally, modeled colon screening registers in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and crowded housing rests in the top 7.9% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 8.0% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 33031, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.6 ± 1.4 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.9 years — 3.3 years below them.

    Ranked #2,568 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.7%15.6–19.8
High blood pressure among adults30.5%27.3–33.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Depression among adults14.5%12.4–16.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.1–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.1%28.9–35.4
Obesity among adults31.0%26.2–36.0
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.5%12.1–17.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years28.0%25.2–31.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.3%69.1–75.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.6%70.1–76.8
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.5–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.6%51.1–60.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.9%47.7–54.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%67.6–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.2–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%11.2–14.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.2%29.3–37.0
Short sleep duration among adults40.5%36.1–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.7%21.2–26.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.7–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%13.0–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%14.3–17.6
Any disability among adults29.5%26.1–32.6
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.8–9.6
Mobility disability among adults14.1%12.5–15.7
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
Vision disability among adults8.4%7.7–9.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6423.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)14.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)49.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate57.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population46.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households33.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+8.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age33.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$73,429$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$424,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,658$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured