ZIP code
32667
in Micanopy, FloridaPopulation 3,944
50.64/ 100
Ranked #15,361 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)
Ranked #553 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 43%)
Ranked #7 of 26 Ocala, FL ZIPs (top 27%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Fatal road crashes
86.2 per 100,000 residents per year
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.
A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
175.6 days/year
in the top 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST34thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›Civic-institution access
0.97 per 1,000 residents
in the top 4.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
38.3%
in the top 6.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST61stUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
43.7%
in the top 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST79thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
0.89%
in the bottom 18% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS18thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Households without a vehicle
0.81%
in the bottom 19% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS19thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with no vehicle available.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
0.02%
in the bottom 19% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST9thUS19thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
82.1%
in the bottom 22% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST9thUS22ndDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
17.4%
in the bottom 26% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS26thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Cross-source signals
Combined exposures in this ZIP
More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.
This area ranks among the highest 10% of US ZIP codes for both humid-heat days and flood exposure.
See the full flooding, evacuation & humid-heat analysis →
The read
Overall, Micanopy, Florida (ZIP 32667) places in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,361st) and the bottom 43% of Florida (553rd).
The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: civic lies in the top 4.4% nationally, and modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 10.5% nationally. Park land resides in the top 12.4% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Physicians lands in the top 15% nationally. Pulling the other way, fatal road crashes stands in the top 0.8% nationally, modeled humid heat registers in the top 2.0% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol sits in the top 7.8% nationally, and coronary heart disease lies in the top 15% nationally.
Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 32608, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Ocala, FL metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 62%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 69%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 76%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 74%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 84%
8%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 40%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 45%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 24%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 5%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 82%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 69%
11%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 49%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 55%
8%
Disability
healthier than 45%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 25%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 38%
16%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 30%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 17%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 61%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 65%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 61%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 87%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 87%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 87%
8%
Disability
healthier than 87%
7%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 13%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 30%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
32113
Floridashares a border
Score 40.42
Closest healthier
32608
Floridashares a border
Score 55.82
Similar health profile
33948
Florida99% similar profile
Score 50.98
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 33.4% | 30.9–36.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 42.1% | 39.2–45.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 12.1% | 11.3–13.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.0% | 9.1–11.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.4% | 8.6–10.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.6% | 8.7–10.6 |
| Depression among adults | 18.9% | 16.8–21.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.8% | 13.4–16.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.7% | 40.6–46.8 |
| Obesity among adults | 34.2% | 30.1–38.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.7% | 4.3–5.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 13.0% | 11.3–14.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.8% | 9.4–12.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.7% | 80.8–84.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.2% | 80.1–84.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.5% | 88.4–90.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 70.9% | 67.6–73.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 60.6% | 57.9–63.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.4% | 69.2–78.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.9% | 12.1–15.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 13.9% | 12.2–15.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.4% | 20.8–26.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.6% | 31.9–39.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 20.6% | 18.5–22.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.5% | 14.2–17.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.4% | 14.1–16.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 13.2% | 12.1–14.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 33.5% | 30.6–36.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.1% | 8.3–10.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.5% | 7.8–9.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 17.5% | 15.9–19.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.6% | 4.2–5.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.9% | 5.4–6.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | FL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 9.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 11.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 9.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 15.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 7.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 39.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 29.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.9% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972 |
| Broadband subscription | 82.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 17.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 33.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972 |
| Homeownership rate | 88.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 74.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.9% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.8% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 11.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977 |
| Single-parent households | 76.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968 |
| Population 65+ | 31.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977 |
| Median age | 54.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972 |
| Median household income | $81,659 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946 |
| Median home value | $258,300 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932 |
| Median gross rent | $1,065 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | FL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 75.4 yr ± 1.15 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.15 years of 75.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured