Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33857

in Lorida, FloridaPopulation 756

44.88/ 100

Ranked #22,540 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #749 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Too few scored ZIPs in the Sebring, FL metro area to rank within it.

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

200 days/year

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

48.7%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.9%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

65.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.8%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.7 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.7%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Lorida, Florida (ZIP 33857), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 30% nationally (22,540th) and the bottom 23% of Florida (749th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled humid heat resides in the top 0.5% nationally, and high cholesterol is in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 1.9% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water stands at the national maximum. Floodplain exposure registers in the top 2.0% nationally, modeled hearing disability settles in the top 5.2% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water sits at the national maximum. Walkability lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally. More encouragingly, homeownership rests at the national maximum, and modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 5.3% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 33875, about 6.4 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sebring, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.3%36.7–43.8
High blood pressure among adults47.4%43.5–51.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.2%12.9–15.6
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults11.9%10.5–13.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%9.8–13.7
Depression among adults17.9%15.3–20.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.3%15.9–20.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened48.7%44.8–52.6
Obesity among adults36.7%31.4–41.9
Stroke among adults5.5%4.8–6.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%14.1–19.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.6%10.4–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.0%81.4–86.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.9%80.3–85.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.3%88.9–91.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%66.0–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.5%54.2–60.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%69.7–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.7–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.2–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.9%26.3–35.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%30.9–39.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.2%20.7–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.5–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.4–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.6–15.6
Any disability among adults36.8%32.2–41.3
Hearing disability among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
Independent living disability among adults9.3%7.9–10.8
Mobility disability among adults20.8%17.8–24.0
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.4–6.0
Vision disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6430.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)18.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population5.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households88.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+41.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age61.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$80,313$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$191,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.3 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 75.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured