Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33852

in Lake Placid, FloridaPopulation 22,600

42.98/ 100

Ranked #24,393 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #804 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Too few scored ZIPs in the Sebring, FL metro area to rank within it.

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

211.7 days/year

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.8%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

47.3%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

55.7%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.8%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.5%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.4%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Overall, Lake Placid, Florida (ZIP 33852) lands in the bottom 24% nationally (24,393rd) and the bottom 17% of Florida (804th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled humid heat stands in the top 0.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease lies in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 1.3% nationally, and disaster risk sits in the top 2.6% nationally. Floodplain exposure is in the top 3.1% nationally, modeled hearing disability settles in the top 5.2% nationally, and modeled uninsured resides in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled diabetes registers in the top 7.0% nationally, and stroke rests in the top 6.9% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 4.6% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 33857, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sebring, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 86.4; chronic-disease standing 6.3 (bottom 10%) — 80 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #489 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.3%35.2–41.5
High blood pressure among adults46.3%42.8–49.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.3%12.2–14.5
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults11.8%10.7–13.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.3–12.7
Depression among adults17.2%14.8–19.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.4%16.3–20.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened47.3%43.6–51.1
Obesity among adults36.6%31.7–41.9
Stroke among adults5.6%5.2–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.6%15.8–21.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.3%16.1–20.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.3%81.0–85.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%79.3–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.3–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.6%64.4–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.7%50.6–56.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%69.7–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.5%9.5–13.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.9–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.1%29.3–37.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%30.9–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.2%23.6–29.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.1–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%16.0–19.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%13.2–16.3
Any disability among adults38.3%34.6–42.1
Hearing disability among adults11.8%10.7–13.1
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Mobility disability among adults21.5%19.2–23.9
Self-care disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6431.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)14.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)7.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription80.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate81.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population14.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households66.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+37.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age54.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$54,284$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$213,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,158$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured