ZIP code
34661
in Nobleton, FloridaPopulation 386
44.86/ 100
Ranked #22,568 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)
Ranked #750 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 23%)
Ranked #120 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (bottom 9.8%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Park land
62.3%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
177.6 days/year
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST37thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
60.1%
in the bottom 2.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
15.5%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
11.1%
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
2.7%
in the bottom 4.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS4thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
45.4%
in the top 3.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
12.0%
in the bottom 6.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
11.1%
in the top 8.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.4%
in the top 8.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, Nobleton, Florida (ZIP 34661) sits in the bottom 30% nationally (22,568th) and the bottom 23% of Florida (750th).
Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled humid heat resides in the top 1.9% nationally, home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 3.9% nationally, high cholesterol is in the top 3.7% nationally, and hearing disability rests in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled stroke sits in the top 8.9% nationally. Better still, park land registers in the top 1.5% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 6.8% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 33513, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 83%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 71%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 61%
8%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 50%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 56%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Disability
healthier than 18%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 22%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 23%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 74%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 64%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 81%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 52%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 49%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 25%
8%
Disability
healthier than 16%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 6%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 69%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 69%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 61%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 83%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 42%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 21%
8%
Disability
healthier than 6%
7%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
33513
Floridashares a border
Score 46.20
Closest healthier
34601
Floridashares a border
Score 45.77
Similar health profile
32132
Florida99% similar profile
Score 46.81
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 36.4% | 32.7–40.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 43.5% | 39.2–47.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 12.8% | 11.5–14.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.1% | 8.9–11.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.1% | 9.7–12.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.4% | 10.2–14.7 |
| Depression among adults | 20.8% | 17.6–24.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 17.2% | 14.8–19.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 45.4% | 41.2–49.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 37.3% | 31.1–43.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.4% | 4.6–6.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 19.6% | 16.2–23.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.2% | 9.2–16.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 83.0% | 80.1–85.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.2% | 76.9–83.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.5% | 85.4–89.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 70.0% | 65.7–74.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 53.8% | 50.1–57.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 71.9% | 64.0–78.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.0% | 9.7–14.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.9% | 14.2–21.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 29.8% | 24.5–35.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.0% | 30.7–41.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.0% | 20.0–28.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.2% | 14.8–19.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.4% | 15.8–21.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.4% | 12.8–18.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 39.4% | 34.0–44.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.1% | 9.7–12.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.3% | 8.5–12.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 21.5% | 18.2–25.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.4% | 4.5–6.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.8–8.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | FL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 12.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 11.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 62.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 15.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 15.1% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 11.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 29.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 15.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972 |
| Broadband subscription | 60.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 2.7% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 33.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972 |
| Homeownership rate | 68.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 74.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 11.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977 |
| Single-parent households | 14.8% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968 |
| Population 65+ | 45.6% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977 |
| Median age | 60.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946 |
| Median home value | $145,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | FL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.2 yr ± 2.50 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.50 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured