Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76887

in Voca, TexasPopulation 87

45.79/ 100

Ranked #21,552 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #878 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$155,192

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

28.2 mi

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.4%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.1%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

82.6 days/year

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

19.6 mi

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Voca, Texas (ZIP 76887) sits in the bottom 33% nationally (21,552nd) and the top 47% of Texas (878th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: distance to an emergency room resides in the top 2.2% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease sits in the top 3.0% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol resides in the top 2.6% nationally, extreme heat sits in the top 4.6% nationally, and high blood pressure stands in the top 6.5% nationally. On the better side, poverty resides at the national minimum, and homeownership sits at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 5.0% nationally.

Put plainly, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 76842, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.9%33.2–42.3
High blood pressure among adults47.7%42.4–52.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.5%11.9–15.2
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.6–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults11.4%9.6–13.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%8.7–14.4
Depression among adults22.0%18.3–25.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.9%14.1–20.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.1%41.0–51.0
Obesity among adults34.9%26.2–43.9
Stroke among adults5.5%4.6–6.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.7%8.7–13.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.7%10.8–19.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.7%82.0–87.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.3–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults90.3%88.4–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%65.3–75.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.3%55.6–63.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%69.1–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.8%10.4–15.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%10.5–17.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.7%23.9–37.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%28.1–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.1%19.1–29.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%12.3–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%13.4–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%10.9–16.1
Any disability among adults38.3%31.7–44.9
Hearing disability among adults12.2%10.4–14.2
Independent living disability among adults9.4%7.5–11.5
Mobility disability among adults21.3%16.9–26.1
Self-care disability among adults4.9%3.9–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.0–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+34.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age64.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$155,192$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$224,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.7 yr ± 2.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.24 years of 83.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured