Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32220

in Jacksonville, FloridaPopulation 12,298

44.90/ 100

Ranked #22,517 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #748 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #51 of 60 Jacksonville, FL ZIPs (bottom 15.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

160.4 days/year

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

15.5%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

43.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Park land

18.4%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.3 mi

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

1.2%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 32220, one of several in Jacksonville, Florida ranks in the bottom 30% nationally (22,517th) and the bottom 23% of Florida (748th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled arsenic lands in the bottom 5.5% nationally, and park land settles in the top 7.5% nationally. Lithium in drinking water rests in the bottom 11.9% nationally, and modeled radon lands in the bottom 9.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled humid heat settles in the top 2.7% nationally, modeled transportation noise rests in the top 4.0% nationally, and fatal road crashes lands in the top 5.6% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and modeled short sleep rests in the top 10.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 32205, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jacksonville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.1 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $81,792 predicts 79.3 years — 6.2 years below.

    Ranked #5,759 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.1 ± 1.3 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.8 years — 3.7 years below them.

    Ranked #2,837 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.3–32.1
High blood pressure among adults37.7%34.2–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.1–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.4–10.8
Depression among adults22.1%19.2–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.6%11.9–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%33.4–40.4
Obesity among adults35.2%30.3–40.4
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%11.5–16.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.8%11.7–16.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%73.7–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%72.6–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.7–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%61.4–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.2%49.9–56.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%70.1–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.2–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%15.4–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.4%25.5–33.3
Short sleep duration among adults41.7%36.9–46.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.1%20.2–26.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.7–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.7–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.8–18.9
Any disability among adults34.9%30.9–38.7
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Mobility disability among adults16.6%14.4–18.7
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6412.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)8.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)1.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription83.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate86.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population10.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households44.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+20.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$81,792$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$254,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,330$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.1 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 73.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured