Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33496

in Boca Raton, FloridaPopulation 26,579

65.33/ 100

Ranked #1,875 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.9%)

Ranked #37 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 3.8%)

Ranked #21 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (top 11.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

191 days/year

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

22.2%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.6%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.7%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.7%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.1%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.6%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

88.1%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 33496, one of several in Boca Raton, Florida, overall, ranks in the top 5.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,875th) and the top 3.8% of Florida (37th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled obesity settles in the bottom 2.2% nationally, cognitive disability is in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and colon screening sits in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 5.3% nationally, short sleep lies in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and mammography stands in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 6.3% nationally. On the other side, modeled humid heat registers in the top 0.9% nationally, and tree cover resides at the national minimum. PFOS in drinking water settles in the top 9.8% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 33498, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 85.0 ± 2.3 years. A median household income of $114,885 predicts 80.6 years — 4.4 years above.

    Ranked #133 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 85.0 ± 2.3 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.5 years — 4.5 years above them.

    Ranked #225 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%29.7–36.1
High blood pressure among adults37.5%33.9–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.4%13.2–15.6
Current asthma among adults8.6%7.7–9.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.7–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Depression among adults14.9%12.7–17.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%11.0–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%38.0–45.6
Obesity among adults22.2%18.3–26.7
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.7–11.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.5–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.6%82.2–86.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.2%80.6–85.5
Cholesterol screening among adults91.6%90.5–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.7%70.6–78.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%67.4–73.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.1%74.8–86.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.8–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.9%6.6–9.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%17.6–24.2
Short sleep duration among adults29.7%25.2–34.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.2%13.2–17.5
Frequent mental distress among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.8–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Any disability among adults28.5%25.2–32.1
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Mobility disability among adults14.0%12.1–16.2
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6410.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)63.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription92.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate83.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population22.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households59.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+33.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age51.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$114,885$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$708,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$2,609$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.0 yr ± 1.1778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.17 years of 85.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured