Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33498

in Boca Raton, FloridaPopulation 16,853

66.29/ 100

Ranked #1,519 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 4.8%)

Ranked #26 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 2.7%)

Ranked #16 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (top 8.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

195.4 days/year

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

22.7%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$146,765

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.8%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.1%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

35.1%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 33498, one of several in Boca Raton, Florida comes out in the top 4.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,519th) and the top 2.7% of Florida (26th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled obesity stands in the bottom 2.7% nationally, household income lands in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability is in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Poverty resides in the bottom 7.1% nationally, and mental-health providers rests in the top 7.8% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat lies in the top 0.7% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water sits at the national maximum. PFOS in drinking water settles at the national maximum, and PFAS in drinking water registers at the national maximum. Floodplain exposure stands in the top 7.8% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 33076, about 1.1 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%24.2–30.0
High blood pressure among adults31.9%28.6–35.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.9–11.9
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.6–6.2
Depression among adults15.4%13.2–18.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.4–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%34.6–42.1
Obesity among adults22.7%18.7–27.4
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.1%5.6–8.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%7.5–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%77.7–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.5–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.5%89.2–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.6%66.0–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.6%68.5–74.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%71.7–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.8–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.3%6.9–10.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.7%15.7–21.9
Short sleep duration among adults31.3%26.6–36.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.8%11.8–15.9
Frequent mental distress among adults12.6%11.1–14.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.2%9.8–12.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.8%8.6–11.2
Any disability among adults24.4%21.2–27.7
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.3
Mobility disability among adults11.1%9.5–12.8
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)6.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription96.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate94.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population30.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households52.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+18.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age45.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$146,765$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$656,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$3,501$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured