Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33036

in Islamorada, Village of Islands, FloridaPopulation 3,777

63.03/ 100

Ranked #2,952 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.3%)

Ranked #99 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 10.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

6.5%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

2.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

28.7 mi

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.1%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

55.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.85 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.28 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Park land

30.5%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

45.7%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Islamorada, Village of Islands, Florida (ZIP 33036), by its overall standing, sits in the top 9.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,952nd) and the top 10.2% of Florida (99th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: civic rests in the top 0.8% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 2.2% nationally, and modeled obesity sits in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Childcare settles in the top 3.4% nationally, recreation registers in the top 4.0% nationally, and grocery stands in the top 4.1% nationally. Park land lands in the top 4.6% nationally. By contrast, modeled loud transportation noise is in the top 0.8% nationally, and fatal road crashes resides in the top 2.9% nationally. Housing-cost burden rests in the top 5.1% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 33158, about 46 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

9%

Disability

healthier than 73%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

6%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

22%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

17%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

9%

Disability

healthier than 78%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

22%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

6%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.9%27.3–34.5
High blood pressure among adults39.6%35.4–43.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.0%11.8–14.2
Current asthma among adults8.9%7.9–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.2–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.1–8.5
Depression among adults16.2%13.7–19.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%10.9–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.7%39.1–48.1
Obesity among adults24.1%18.9–29.9
Stroke among adults3.8%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.7–10.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.0–11.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.5%79.5–85.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%78.4–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults91.7%90.4–92.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.4%69.1–77.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.6%64.4–70.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%69.5–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.8–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.9%8.7–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.2%17.4–25.3
Short sleep duration among adults31.4%26.1–36.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.3%13.8–18.9
Frequent mental distress among adults13.2%11.5–15.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%11.9–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%9.1–12.2
Any disability among adults28.5%24.4–32.7
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.5–9.6
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.4–7.3
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.0–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.8–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.8–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6419.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription95.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate84.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population15.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households66.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+31.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age57.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$86,032$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$1,017,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,852$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 1.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.70 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured