Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33417

in West Palm Beach, FloridaPopulation 38,079

47.79/ 100

Ranked #19,188 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #661 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #156 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (bottom 14.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

96.3%

in the top 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

187.1 days/year

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

20.9%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.6%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

43.2%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.5%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.7%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.7%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 33417, one of several in West Palm Beach, Florida, by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 40% nationally (19,188th) and the bottom 32% of Florida (661st).

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled pfas lies in the top 0.03% nationally, humid heat sits in the top 1.2% nationally, and uninsured settles in the top 3.9% nationally. Housing-cost burden registers in the top 6.9% nationally, modeled stroke stands in the top 7.8% nationally, and modeled vision disability lands in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled diabetes is in the top 9.1% nationally. More positively, modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and arsenic rests in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Modeled radon lies in the bottom 1.6% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 33409, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.6 ± 1.3 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.1 years — 4.5 years below them.

    Ranked #3,216 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%29.8–35.7
High blood pressure among adults41.9%38.5–45.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.6–11.5
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%9.2–11.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.8–10.9
Depression among adults15.2%13.0–17.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.7%15.7–19.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%36.5–43.8
Obesity among adults30.0%25.2–35.2
Stroke among adults5.5%5.0–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.4%14.3–20.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years20.9%18.6–23.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.8%80.6–85.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%78.2–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%85.3–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%61.6–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.6%49.0–56.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.2%68.8–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.6%8.8–12.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%12.4–16.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.5%29.6–37.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.9%32.8–43.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.5%23.9–29.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%14.1–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%15.0–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%14.1–17.4
Any disability among adults38.5%35.0–42.5
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.3–11.4
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Mobility disability among adults21.1%19.0–23.4
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.4
Vision disability among adults8.7%8.0–9.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6421.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)17.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle11.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription88.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate59.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population37.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households48.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+29.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age47.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$51,605$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$175,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,647$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.6 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 76.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured