ZIP code
85723
in Tucson, ArizonaPopulation 244
36.91/ 100
Ranked #28,581 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.9%)
Ranked #328 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 17%)
Ranked #42 of 46 Tucson, AZ ZIPs (bottom 8.7%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Coronary heart disease
26.3%
in the top 0.01% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
30.9%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Stroke
11.7%
in the top 0.02% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
37.3%
in the top 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
66.2%
in the top 0.02% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
27.1%
in the top 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
14.4%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
55.2%
in the top 0.02% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
10.0%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
6.3%
in the bottom 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, ZIP 85723, one of several in Tucson, Arizona lands in the bottom 10.9% nationally (28,581st) and the bottom 17% of Arizona (328th).
Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 0.01% nationally, and hearing disability sits at the national maximum. Modeled stroke is in the top 0.02% nationally, and mobility disability settles in the top 0.04% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 0.02% nationally, diabetes registers in the top 0.2% nationally, and vision disability rests in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol stands in the top 0.02% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the top 0.7% nationally. On the better side, modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 0.04% nationally.
Set beside the nearby areas, hearing disability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 85713, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tucson, AZ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 60%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 73%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.2%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 88%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.7%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 9%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 14%
13%
Disability
in the bottom 1.0%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 19%
5%
Lifting this score
Mental Health
in the top 0.3%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 86%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 46%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 50%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 51%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.8%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 18%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 36%
14%
Disability
healthier than 10%
7%
Lifting this score
Mental Health
in the top 0.00%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 74%
5%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 53%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.00%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 7%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 12%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 35%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 37%
11%
Disability
healthier than 2%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
85713
Arizonashares a border
Score 41.66
Closest healthier
85701
Arizonaabout 1.4 mi away
Score 51.54
Similar health profile
39354
Mississippi95% similar profile
Score 45.61
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 47.7% | 43.9–51.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 66.2% | 62.9–69.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 18.7% | 16.5–21.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 8.0% | 7.0–9.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 26.3% | 22.0–31.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 18.9% | 13.7–24.5 |
| Depression among adults | 13.5% | 11.7–15.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 27.1% | 23.6–31.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 55.2% | 51.8–58.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 32.4% | 28.2–36.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 11.7% | 9.2–14.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.8% | 15.8–22.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 23.7% | 17.5–30.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 86.9% | 84.6–88.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 85.4% | 83.2–87.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 91.2% | 89.4–92.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 59.1% | 54.7–63.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 37.5% | 34.5–40.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 60.4% | 53.1–67.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 6.3% | 5.3–7.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.0% | 10.8–17.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 40.1% | 32.5–47.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.0% | 31.4–38.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 39.3% | 31.4–47.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 10.5% | 9.0–12.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 23.1% | 18.8–27.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.9% | 12.5–20.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 59.3% | 52.3–65.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 30.9% | 26.8–35.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 13.8% | 10.1–17.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 37.3% | 29.7–44.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 10.0% | 7.5–13.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 14.4% | 11.1–18.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.0% | 23.4–32.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.9% | 13.8–22.7 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 15.1% | 11.4–19.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.9% | 7.4–10.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.7% | 7.8–12.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.4% | 24.3–32.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.1% | 6.1–8.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 66.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 4.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 100.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 0.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 0.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 2.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 44.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 29.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.2 yr ± 1.21 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 74.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured