Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39769

in Sturgis, MississippiPopulation 1,556

47.44/ 100

Ranked #19,623 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #76 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Crowded housing

13.8%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

38.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.6%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 13.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

58%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Sturgis, Mississippi (ZIP 39769) lands in the bottom 39% nationally (19,623rd) and the top 19% of Mississippi (76th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: childcare is in the top 8.8% nationally, and modeled radon stands in the bottom 13.7% nationally. Modeled tree cover settles in the top 16% nationally, and disaster risk lies in the bottom 16% nationally. Against that, crowded housing resides in the top 2.6% nationally, fatal road crashes lands in the top 7.5% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure registers in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled humid heat sits in the top 12.4% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 13.7% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 39759, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.7–37.8
High blood pressure among adults46.6%43.2–50.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.7–10.4
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.3–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.3–10.7
Depression among adults19.1%16.6–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.9%14.1–17.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%37.9–45.0
Obesity among adults37.5%32.5–43.0
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.1%13.5–18.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%7.7–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.1%80.9–85.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.1%79.4–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.5–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%59.8–68.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%65.3–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.9–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.6–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.5%26.6–34.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%29.9–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%19.6–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.6–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%13.2–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.4%13.7–17.3
Any disability among adults36.2%32.5–40.1
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.6
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Mobility disability among adults19.2%17.0–21.5
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.6%20.7–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.3–17.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.8–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.0–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Loneliness among adults31.1%27.4–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6415.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription83.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate71.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)13.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households48.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+16.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age30.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$69,079$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$156,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$850$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured