Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33412

in West Palm Beach, FloridaPopulation 15,859

62.86/ 100

Ranked #3,050 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.6%)

Ranked #105 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 10.8%)

Ranked #46 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

196.8 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

82.2%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

0.97%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.2%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Park land

33.7%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$130,225

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

37.8%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

98%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.7%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 33412, one of several in West Palm Beach, Florida sits in the top 9.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,050th) and the top 10.8% of Florida (105th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 1.7% nationally, modeled obesity is in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and park land lies in the top 4.1% nationally. Household income registers in the top 7.0% nationally, home broadband subscription is in the top 7.4% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability lies in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Modeled energy burden registers in the bottom 8.0% nationally. On the other hand, modeled humid heat is in the top 0.6% nationally, and pfas lies in the top 1.5% nationally. Floodplain exposure registers in the top 6.9% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 33418, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.6%25.8–31.7
High blood pressure among adults34.6%31.4–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.2–12.3
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Depression among adults15.5%13.3–18.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.5–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%35.6–43.0
Obesity among adults24.2%20.1–29.0
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.3%5.8–9.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.4%9.1–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%78.8–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.7–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.9%88.6–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%67.3–75.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.2%64.8–71.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%72.7–84.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.4–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.7%8.3–11.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%17.7–23.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.3%28.5–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%13.3–17.3
Frequent mental distress among adults13.5%12.0–15.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.7–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.7%9.6–12.1
Any disability among adults26.6%23.4–29.9
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.1
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Mobility disability among adults12.2%10.6–13.9
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6413.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription98.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate85.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population18.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households60.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+29.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age52.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$130,225$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$643,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$2,321$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured