Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32653

in Gainesville, FloridaPopulation 15,150

59.61/ 100

Ranked #5,145 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #197 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #3 of 29 Gainesville, FL ZIPs (top 10.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

166.6 days/year

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

41.5%

in the top 28% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 32653, one of several in Gainesville, Florida, overall, ranks in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,145th) and the top 20% of Florida (197th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 8.6% nationally, physicians rests in the top 10.5% nationally, and park land registers in the top 11.1% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 12.7% nationally, civic settles in the top 13.0% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability is in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Modeled tooth loss sits in the bottom 13.0% nationally. Set against that, modeled humid heat lands in the top 2.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 12.0% nationally. Floodplain exposure stands in the top 15% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 32605, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Gainesville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.8 ± 1.3 years. The 43 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.2 years — 3.7 years above them.

    Ranked #468 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.0%25.2–31.2
High blood pressure among adults36.0%32.5–39.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.7–11.6
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.2
Depression among adults18.0%15.6–21.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.4–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.1–45.0
Obesity among adults30.2%25.4–35.9
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.0%6.5–9.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%7.7–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.5–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.6–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults89.9%88.5–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%66.3–74.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%61.3–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.6%69.0–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.6–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.0%8.5–11.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.3%16.3–22.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.8%29.3–38.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.6–17.7
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%13.0–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.3%10.0–12.8
Any disability among adults27.7%24.3–31.2
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.8
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Mobility disability among adults12.6%11.0–14.4
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–646.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)2.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate83.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population11.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households50.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+22.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age46.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$93,913$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$301,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,188$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured