Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34241

in Sarasota, FloridaPopulation 16,408

60.34/ 100

Ranked #4,602 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.4%)

Ranked #180 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #14 of 42 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

197.4 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

0.99%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.5%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.3%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

56.2%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.5%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$116,412

in the top 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

89.6%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.9%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 34241, one of several in Sarasota, Florida, by its composite score, sits in the top 14.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,602nd) and the top 18% of Florida (180th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and energy burden sits in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lies in the bottom 6.3% nationally, and obesity rests in the bottom 13.0% nationally. Modeled colon screening resides in the top 8.9% nationally, household income is in the top 10.9% nationally, and modeled independent living disability lands in the bottom 10.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled humid heat stands in the top 0.6% nationally, modeled pfas registers in the top 9.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the top 10.7% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 34238, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.9 ± 2.2 years. A median household income of $116,412 predicts 80.7 years — 3.2 years above.

    Ranked #371 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.9 ± 2.2 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.1 years — 3.8 years above them.

    Ranked #426 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%27.5–33.8
High blood pressure among adults37.4%33.8–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.9%11.8–14.0
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Depression among adults18.5%15.8–21.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.6–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.5%38.7–46.3
Obesity among adults28.6%23.7–33.7
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.6%6.1–9.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%7.3–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.0%79.3–84.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%78.8–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%89.3–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.5%68.4–76.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.8%65.8–71.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%69.9–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.4–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.9%8.2–11.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%16.5–23.1
Short sleep duration among adults31.6%27.2–36.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.2–17.8
Frequent mental distress among adults13.5%11.9–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.2–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.3%8.9–11.6
Any disability among adults26.8%23.2–30.5
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.1
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Mobility disability among adults12.9%11.0–14.9
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6413.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription95.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate88.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population9.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households62.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+29.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age51.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$116,412$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$564,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,795$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.9 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 83.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured