ZIP code

32669

in Newberry, FloridaPopulation 17,704

ZipVitals Score

How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

57.85/ 100

Ranked #6,524 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #250 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #4 of 29 Gainesville, FL ZIPs (top 13.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

Jump to a section

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.95%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th

US1st

Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

168.4 days/year

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th

US98th

Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Newberry, Florida (ZIP 32669) ranks in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,524th) and the top 26% of Florida (250th).

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and grocery lies in the top 15.0% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription is in the top 18% nationally, modeled fair or poor health settles in the bottom 20% nationally, and modeled independent living disability resides in the bottom 20% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 21% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the bottom 22% nationally. Set against that, modeled humid heat stands in the top 2.3% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 32605, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Gainesville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare withinUnited StatesFloridaMetro area

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of the United States

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

Disability

healthier than 78%

About typical

close to the middle of the United States

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of the United States

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of Florida

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

About typical

close to the middle of Florida

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of Florida

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of this metro area

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

Disability

healthier than 89%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

About typical

close to the middle of this metro area

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of this metro area

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Arthritis among adults	26.4%	23.6–29.2
High blood pressure among adults	33.7%	30.3–37.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults	9.5%	8.7–10.3
Current asthma among adults	10.0%	8.9–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults	6.1%	5.5–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults	6.4%	5.7–7.1
Depression among adults	19.5%	16.8–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults	11.0%	9.7–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened	38.9%	35.3–42.7
Obesity among adults	31.4%	26.5–36.7
Stroke among adults	3.2%	2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years	9.9%	8.1–11.8

PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years	10.0%	8.6–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure	77.7%	74.8–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults	79.4%	76.5–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults	88.3%	86.8–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years	66.4%	62.3–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults	61.3%	58.1–64.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years	73.0%	66.4–78.9

Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Binge drinking among adults	16.7%	14.1–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults	11.7%	10.1–13.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults	19.9%	17.0–22.9
Short sleep duration among adults	35.3%	30.8–39.8

Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults	16.1%	14.2–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults	16.3%	14.5–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults	12.6%	11.2–14.0

DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults	12.7%	11.3–14.1
Any disability among adults	28.1%	24.8–31.4
Hearing disability among adults	6.5%	5.8–7.2
Independent living disability among adults	6.9%	6.2–7.6
Mobility disability among adults	12.2%	10.7–13.7
Self-care disability among adults	3.2%	2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults	4.3%	4.0–4.7

Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate	8.8%	10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364	11.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–64	7.3%	9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286	15.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)	2.2%	7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505	8.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)	44.4%	23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505	29.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)	3.2%	3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274	4.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle	2.6%	3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322	4.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription	95.2%	89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322	91.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)	19.9%	23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322	33.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate	87.5%	78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322	74.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)	0.9%	1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322	2.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population	10.1%	2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553	11.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households	54.9%	53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087	52.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+	19.2%	19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553	20.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age	40.9 yr	42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292	43.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income	$99,548	$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318	$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value	$343,300	$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049	$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent	$1,728	$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670	$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901

Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

Statistically similar ZIPs nationally

Similar means a ZIP whose health profile is shaped like this one’s — the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses across the nine health domains behind the Score, not similar demographics or income. The percentage is how closely the two patterns line up. A very similar ZIP can still have a different overall Score.

60002Illinois99% similar
Score 58.54View 60002 Compare this ZIP with 60002
89052Nevada99% similar
Score 58.47View 89052 Compare this ZIP with 89052
85383Arizona99% similar
Score 64.49View 85383 Compare this ZIP with 85383
75093Texas99% similar
Score 67.69View 75093 Compare this ZIP with 75093
32259Florida99% similar
Score 67.32View 32259 Compare this ZIP with 32259
75025Texas99% similar
Score 66.87View 75025 Compare this ZIP with 75025
85298Arizona99% similar
Score 65.42View 85298 Compare this ZIP with 85298
77094Texas99% similar
Score 67.13View 77094 Compare this ZIP with 77094
32578Florida99% similar
Score 60.05View 32578 Compare this ZIP with 32578
85083Arizona98% similar
Score 64.94View 85083 Compare this ZIP with 85083

as of 2026

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured