Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31207

in Macon, GeorgiaPopulation 1,479

41.82/ 100

Ranked #25,374 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #521 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #14 of 21 Macon-Bibb County, GA ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

17%

in the bottom 0.01% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

14.2%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

31%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

54.8%

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17.7%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

30.1%

in the top 0.07% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

1.2%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

25.1%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

18%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

3.1%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 31207, one of several in Macon, Georgia ranks in the bottom 21% nationally (25,374th) and the bottom 27% of Georgia (521st).

continue reading

A number of measures mark what daily life looks like here: modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 0.2% nationally, and loneliness is in the top 0.01% nationally. Modeled independent living disability settles in the top 0.7% nationally, and transportation resides in the top 0.07% nationally. Modeled uninsured registers in the top 2.2% nationally, modeled food insecurity rests in the top 0.7% nationally, and slow internet speeds stands in the top 0.9% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 0.6% nationally, diabetes lands in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and stroke sits in the bottom 0.7% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, colon screening runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Close by, ZIP 31210, about 2.8 miles away, ranks healthier overall. On other measures, the area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Macon-Bibb County, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 1.0%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.09%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 19.9; chronic-disease standing 99.1 (top 1%) — 79 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,135 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults5.0%4.0–6.0
High blood pressure among adults18.0%14.9–21.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults0.5%0.5–0.6
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.3–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults1.2%0.9–1.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults2.9%2.2–4.0
Depression among adults25.4%21.3–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults3.1%2.5–3.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened14.2%11.7–16.9
Obesity among adults36.9%30.1–44.3
Stroke among adults0.8%0.7–1.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years25.1%18.1–34.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure24.7%19.8–30.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.0%66.0–75.7
Cholesterol screening among adults59.9%53.1–66.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years17.0%13.2–21.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.7%42.6–50.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%12.6–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%7.3–13.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.0%25.4–40.4
Short sleep duration among adults40.8%34.7–47.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.1%21.3–35.5
Frequent mental distress among adults30.2%25.8–34.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.1–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults31.0%25.3–37.7
Any disability among adults43.7%37.0–51.8
Hearing disability among adults2.9%2.4–3.5
Independent living disability among adults17.7%13.7–22.7
Mobility disability among adults6.6%5.0–9.2
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults10.4%8.0–13.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.1%24.7–36.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults46.4%36.8–57.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults38.5%28.4–48.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.9%22.9–37.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults30.1%24.1–36.8
Loneliness among adults54.8%48.5–61.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults20.1%15.5–24.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)100.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)9.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population12.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age20.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 3.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.22 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured