Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33965

in Fort Myers, FloridaPopulation 4,836

32.67/ 100

Ranked #30,130 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.1%)

Ranked #956 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 1.9%)

Ranked #35 of 35 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL ZIPs (bottom 2.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Cognitive disability

37.1%

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

52.2%

in the top 0.04% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

23.1%

in the top 0.04% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

10.4%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

16.1%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

58.2%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

223 days/year

in the top 0.04% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

46.5%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.4%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

18.1%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • People living in poverty
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 33965, one of several in Fort Myers, Florida comes out in the bottom 6.1% nationally (30,130th) and the bottom 1.9% of Florida (956th).

continue reading

The measures that shape daily life here come through in the data: modeled cognitive disability rests in the top 0.01% nationally, tooth loss lies in the top 0.04% nationally, and energy burden sits in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the bottom 0.6% nationally, humid heat registers in the top 0.04% nationally, and colon screening stands in the bottom 1.0% nationally. Homeownership lands at the national minimum, and slow internet speeds is in the top 0.5% nationally. Poverty resides in the top 0.5% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 1.1% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 33913, just across the boundary. This ZIP further shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.01%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults8.1%6.9–9.4
High blood pressure among adults18.1%15.6–20.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults1.1%1.0–1.3
Current asthma among adults13.5%11.7–15.5
Coronary heart disease among adults2.3%2.0–2.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.5–7.7
Depression among adults32.3%28.1–36.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened16.1%13.9–18.5
Obesity among adults32.5%27.2–38.1
Stroke among adults1.3%1.1–1.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years52.2%46.4–58.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years21.8%18.0–27.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure27.7%24.4–31.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults68.3%63.7–72.8
Cholesterol screening among adults51.5%45.8–56.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years46.5%41.3–51.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults33.0%29.5–36.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years58.2%49.5–66.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.4–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%13.7–20.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.7%28.3–40.2
Short sleep duration among adults41.4%35.8–47.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.6%25.9–34.3
Frequent mental distress among adults36.0%32.2–39.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.8–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults37.1%33.1–41.4
Any disability among adults48.6%43.7–53.8
Hearing disability among adults4.6%3.9–5.3
Independent living disability among adults23.1%20.2–26.3
Mobility disability among adults8.9%7.5–10.5
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.1
Vision disability among adults12.4%10.8–14.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate77.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–644.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)17.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription89.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)67.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate0.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population4.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age19.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$26,354$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,339$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 1.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.88 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured