Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39217

in Jackson, MississippiPopulation 2,125

44.25/ 100

Ranked #23,171 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #133 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #25 of 59 Jackson, MS ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

14.3%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

28.1%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

51.9%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

1.1%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

2.7%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

0.90%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

20.3%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

2.6%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

ZIP 39217, one of several in Jackson, Mississippi, overall, ranks in the bottom 28% nationally (23,171st) and the top 33% of Mississippi (133rd).

continue reading

This area's defining measures are easy to pick out: modeled cognitive disability stands in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled loneliness rests in the top 0.06% nationally, and poverty registers at the national maximum. Homeownership resides at the national minimum, and modeled transportation settles in the top 0.7% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled coronary heart disease is in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and diabetes sits in the bottom 0.7% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 0.6% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, poverty runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 39201, about 0.7 miles away, comes out healthier overall. This area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jackson, MS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 35.4; chronic-disease standing 98.5 (top 10%) — 63 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,712 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults5.1%4.1–6.1
High blood pressure among adults20.3%17.0–23.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults0.6%0.5–0.7
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.5–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults1.1%1.0–1.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults2.5%2.0–3.3
Depression among adults22.5%18.9–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults2.7%2.2–3.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened14.3%11.9–17.0
Obesity among adults33.9%27.6–40.4
Stroke among adults0.9%0.7–1.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years27.3%22.5–32.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%9.9–21.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure28.5%23.3–34.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.2%69.4–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults64.8%58.2–70.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years52.8%46.7–59.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults6.9%5.8–8.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.1–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.5%6.8–12.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%22.0–35.8
Short sleep duration among adults41.7%35.9–47.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.0%16.4–27.4
Frequent mental distress among adults26.8%23.0–30.7
Frequent physical distress among adults9.6%7.9–11.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults28.1%23.1–33.9
Any disability among adults39.9%33.5–46.9
Hearing disability among adults2.6%2.2–3.1
Independent living disability among adults13.8%10.7–17.6
Mobility disability among adults5.5%4.2–7.5
Self-care disability among adults2.4%1.8–3.2
Vision disability among adults7.2%5.6–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults37.0%30.6–43.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults37.1%26.7–47.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.8%12.3–28.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.2%17.4–31.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults24.6%18.7–30.9
Loneliness among adults51.9%45.7–58.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.5%11.4–19.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate100.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6423.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)100.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)17.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate0.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age19.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.2 yr ± 2.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.07 years of 73.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured