ZIP code
33620
in Tampa, FloridaPopulation 7,298
42.51/ 100
Ranked #24,814 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)
Ranked #820 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 16%)
Ranked #129 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (bottom 3.1%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Cognitive disability
36%
in the top 0.01% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
22.9%
in the top 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
17.3%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
13.1%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
18.4%
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
1.8%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
14.7%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
3.5%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, ZIP 33620, one of several in Tampa, Florida lands in the bottom 23% nationally (24,814th) and the bottom 16% of Florida (820th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 0.01% nationally, independent living disability resides in the top 0.04% nationally, and vision disability settles in the top 1.2% nationally. Poverty is at the national maximum, housing-cost burden sits at the national maximum, and homeownership lands at the national minimum. On the brighter side, modeled high cholesterol lies in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and high blood pressure stands in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and diabetes registers in the bottom 0.9% nationally.
Against the wider neighborhood, poverty runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. On the overall standing, ZIP 33613, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 88%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 3%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 36%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 18%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 1%
8%
Disability
healthier than 13%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 32%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 94%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 80%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOHPartial
in the bottom 0.4%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 11%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 15%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.2%
8%
Disability
healthier than 12%
7%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.7%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 92%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 76%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOHPartial
in the bottom 0.00%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 15%
14%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.00%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 6%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 2%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
33612
Floridashares a border
Score 39.67
Closest healthier
33613
Floridashares a border
Score 47.11
Similar health profile
20057
District of Columbia98% similar profile
Score 38.47
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 6.3% | 5.3–7.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 18.4% | 15.7–21.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 0.8% | 0.7–0.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 13.1% | 11.4–15.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 1.8% | 1.5–2.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.5% | 4.7–6.4 |
| Depression among adults | 29.3% | 25.5–33.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 3.5% | 2.9–4.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 17.3% | 14.8–20.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 31.8% | 26.8–37.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.0% | 0.9–1.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.9% | 11.6–18.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 22.1% | 18.7–26.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 23.2% | 18.9–28.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 67.7% | 63.2–72.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 50.5% | 45.9–54.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.3% | 57.2–66.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 48.6% | 44.8–52.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.3% | 73.1–84.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.9% | 14.0–20.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.1% | 12.7–18.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.5% | 28.0–37.6 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 39.5% | 34.8–44.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 30.4% | 27.0–34.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 35.6% | 32.1–39.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.4% | 13.5–17.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 36.0% | 32.6–39.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 49.5% | 44.7–54.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.3% | 3.7–5.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 22.9% | 20.4–25.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 8.4% | 7.2–9.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.3% | 3.8–4.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 13.1% | 11.7–14.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | FL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 100.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 11.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 2.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 15.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 33.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 29.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 8.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972 |
| Broadband subscription | 14.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 100.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 33.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972 |
| Homeownership rate | 0.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 74.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972 |
| Foreign-born population | 11.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 11.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977 |
| Median age | 19.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | FL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured