Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31220

in Macon, GeorgiaPopulation 16,494

56.89/ 100

Ranked #7,382 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #112 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #2 of 21 Macon-Bibb County, GA ZIPs (top 9.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

38.8 per million

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

129.9 days/year

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.6%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

23.9 days/year

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

69.6%

in the top 23% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 31220, one of several in Macon, Georgia comes out in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,382nd) and the top 16% of Georgia (112th).

continue reading

Several good marks anchor the profile and deserve first mention: modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 10.3% nationally, and mammography lands in the top 8.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers resides in the top 16% nationally, and modeled tree cover rests in the top 18% nationally. By contrast, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 7.5% nationally, and loneliness sits in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 10.0% nationally, and homeownership registers in the bottom 15% nationally. Unemployment stands in the top 16% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 31210, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Macon-Bibb County, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.6%23.8–29.4
High blood pressure among adults39.3%35.6–43.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–8.9
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Depression among adults19.0%16.3–21.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.4–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.1–41.6
Obesity among adults38.0%32.0–44.4
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%9.2–13.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.2–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.7–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%78.1–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%87.4–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.6%65.5–73.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.7%62.5–68.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.6%74.9–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.8–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.1%10.4–14.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.0%20.4–27.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.6%32.5–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%15.8–20.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.4–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.4–14.5
Any disability among adults29.3%25.6–33.1
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Independent living disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.9–15.4
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%21.0–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.4–16.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.4–12.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%11.0–14.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.1–9.1
Loneliness among adults38.0%33.4–42.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6415.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)6.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)7.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate59.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population5.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households45.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$88,434$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$192,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,372$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured