ZIP code
30678
in White Plains, GeorgiaPopulation 1,271
44.27/ 100
Ranked #23,149 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)
Ranked #439 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 38%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Diabetes
20.2%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.1%
in the top 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
50.1%
in the top 3.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
11.1%
in the bottom 3.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
17.1 mi
in the top 6.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
6.6%
in the top 7.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST83rdUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
44.6%
in the top 5.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
9.5%
in the bottom 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST14thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
22.2%
in the top 9.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
10.3%
in the top 7.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›The read
Judged by its overall standing, White Plains, Georgia (ZIP 30678) sits in the bottom 28% nationally (23,149th) and the bottom 38% of Georgia (439th).
A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 3.4% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 6.6% nationally, and modeled pfas resides in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled diabetes sits in the top 3.5% nationally, stroke stands in the top 3.6% nationally, and high blood pressure resides in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled self-care disability sits in the top 7.9% nationally, and high cholesterol stands in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 9.0% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 7.7% nationally.
Put plainly, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 30642, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 91%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 68%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 78%
8%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 44%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 47%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 7%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 23%
16%
Disability
healthier than 13%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 30%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 91%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 89%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 82%
8%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 42%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 60%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 44%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 10%
21%
Disability
healthier than 20%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 35%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 91.2 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 7.3 (bottom 10%) — 84 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #324 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
30631
Georgiashares a border
Score 40.74
Closest healthier
30642
Georgiashares a border
Score 58.43
Similar health profile
39877
Georgia99% similar profile
Score 42.66
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.8% | 32.3–39.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 50.1% | 45.7–54.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.0% | 9.0–10.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.7% | 9.5–11.9 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.3% | 9.3–11.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.8% | 9.4–12.2 |
| Depression among adults | 18.8% | 16.1–21.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 20.2% | 17.8–22.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.6% | 40.2–48.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.4% | 31.8–47.1 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.1% | 5.5–6.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 17.1% | 14.5–20.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 13.6% | 11.6–15.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 84.5% | 82.2–86.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 83.2% | 80.4–85.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.3% | 87.9–90.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 69.2% | 64.8–73.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 55.3% | 51.9–58.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.6% | 67.4–80.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.1% | 9.1–13.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.5% | 14.9–20.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 34.3% | 29.3–39.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.8% | 31.8–44.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 27.4% | 24.0–30.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.6% | 14.7–18.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.7% | 15.6–19.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.6% | 13.7–17.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 38.2% | 33.6–42.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.5% | 8.5–10.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.5% | 10.2–12.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.2% | 19.5–24.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.6% | 5.9–7.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.3% | 7.4–9.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.5% | 21.2–28.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 22.0% | 19.2–24.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 20.2% | 17.6–23.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.2% | 14.2–18.4 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.1% | 9.8–12.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 35.1% | 30.2–40.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 11.5% | 10.1–13.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 8.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 27.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 18.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 17.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 22.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 5.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707 |
| Broadband subscription | 75.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 14.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707 |
| Homeownership rate | 71.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 73.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.1% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720 |
| Single-parent households | 64.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705 |
| Population 65+ | 30.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720 |
| Median age | 51.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715 |
| Median household income | $48,529 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677 |
| Median home value | $172,500 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666 |
| Median gross rent | $786 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $993 ($694–$1,769) n=627 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.9 yr ± 2.11 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.11 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured