Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30549

in Jefferson, GeorgiaPopulation 32,075

56.58/ 100

Ranked #7,674 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #118 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

36.7 per million

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

17.3%

in the top 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US73rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Jefferson, Georgia (ZIP 30549), by its composite score, sits in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,674th) and the top 17% of Georgia (118th).

continue reading

The clearest bright points in the data come first here: modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 14.7% nationally, lead in tap water is in the bottom 16% nationally, and modeled energy burden lands in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 17% nationally. By contrast, modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 8.4% nationally, and expected annual loss settles in the top 13.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat lies in the top 18% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 30548, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.7 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $96,195 predicts 79.9 years — 3.2 years below.

    Ranked #4,401 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.0–28.1
High blood pressure among adults33.7%29.6–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.8
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Depression among adults20.8%17.5–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.4–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%32.0–40.6
Obesity among adults32.1%24.9–39.0
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.2%9.9–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.9%9.4–12.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.6%73.4–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%73.4–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.2–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%60.4–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.9%59.3–66.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%68.0–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.1–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%12.1–16.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.5%19.6–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%30.2–43.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.2%15.1–19.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.8–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%12.3–15.4
Any disability among adults27.4%23.7–31.2
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.9–8.5
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.4–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.4–25.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.7–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.8–10.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.3–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Loneliness among adults35.5%30.2–40.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6413.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)8.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate83.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population5.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households46.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+14.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age38.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$96,195$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$350,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,143$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 0.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.45 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured