Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60136

in Gilberts, IllinoisPopulation 8,777

64.35/ 100

Ranked #2,270 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.1%)

Ranked #87 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 6.4%)

Ranked #81 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$147,704

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.7%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

25.1%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.1%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.0%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.7%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.5%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

98.7%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.3%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

Gilberts, Illinois (ZIP 60136), by its overall standing, sits in the top 7.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,270th) and the top 6.4% of Illinois (87th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: household income sits in the top 4.1% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure registers in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 2.3% nationally, stroke lands in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and mobility disability is in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Home broadband subscription resides in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled independent living disability rests in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lies in the bottom 5.1% nationally. By contrast, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 4.5% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 60124, just across the boundary. Looking wider, the ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 28.3; chronic-disease standing 96.6 (top 10%) — 68 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,238 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.1%16.7–21.8
High blood pressure among adults25.1%22.0–28.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.1–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.9%3.4–4.6
Depression among adults19.1%16.3–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.4–10.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.3%27.7–35.2
Obesity among adults32.3%27.0–38.4
Stroke among adults2.0%1.8–2.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.7%4.5–7.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.7–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.1%66.3–74.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.6–78.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.4–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.0%53.0–63.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.7%66.5–73.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.9%67.6–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.5%17.3–24.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.7%7.9–11.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.7%14.7–21.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%29.9–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.9%11.1–15.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%12.8–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults9.7%8.5–11.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%8.9–11.8
Any disability among adults19.6%16.7–22.9
Hearing disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Independent living disability among adults5.2%4.5–6.0
Mobility disability among adults7.7%6.6–9.0
Self-care disability among adults2.2%2.0–2.6
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.6%20.1–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.1–11.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.2–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.9–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Loneliness among adults31.1%26.6–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.6–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–641.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription98.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate92.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population14.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households40.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+11.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age40.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$147,704$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$347,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,747$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 1.2778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.27 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured