Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30141

in Hiram, GeorgiaPopulation 27,220

55.95/ 100

Ranked #8,336 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #125 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #83 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

38.5 per million

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.2%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.89 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

84%

in the top 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.4%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

96.7%

in the top 11.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.8%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hiram, Georgia (ZIP 30141), in overall standing, comes out in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,336th) and the top 18% of Georgia (125th).

continue reading

A healthy showing across the board, and a few measures carry it: dental providers sits in the top 8.8% nationally, modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 10.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription resides in the top 11.5% nationally. Modeled energy burden sits in the bottom 9.3% nationally, physicians stands in the top 13.3% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Grocery sits in the top 14.8% nationally. On the other hand, modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the top 7.7% nationally, and short sleep resides in the top 8.6% nationally. PFOA in drinking water sits in the top 10.8% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 30127, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.9 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $86,824 predicts 79.5 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,692 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 38.5 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 76.9 ± 1.3 years.

    Ranked #1,687 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.1%21.2–27.1
High blood pressure among adults35.9%32.0–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.3–7.7
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Depression among adults20.4%17.3–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.4–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%32.7–41.0
Obesity among adults38.7%31.9–46.0
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.8%8.8–13.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.3%9.8–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%73.9–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%74.9–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%86.0–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%61.2–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.7%58.1–65.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.9%67.2–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.6–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%10.9–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.3%19.7–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults42.2%36.1–48.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.9%15.7–20.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.3–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.5–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%12.3–15.4
Any disability among adults26.9%23.2–30.6
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Mobility disability among adults12.1%10.5–13.7
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.4%21.0–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.7–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.1–12.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.8–15.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.2–9.2
Loneliness among adults35.8%31.0–40.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.1–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6413.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)8.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription96.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate74.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population10.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households36.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+11.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age36.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$86,824$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$283,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,798$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 0.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.66 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured