Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30517

in Braselton, GeorgiaPopulation 18,994

58.56/ 100

Ranked #5,943 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #93 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 13.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.4%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$118,034

in the top 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Braselton, Georgia (ZIP 30517) ranks in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,943rd) and the top 13.1% of Georgia (93rd).

continue reading

A number of signals point in a favorable direction for this area: home broadband subscription resides in the top 9.1% nationally, and modeled energy burden lands in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Household income registers in the top 10.3% nationally, and modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 14.7% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 14.6% nationally, grocery is in the top 16% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 17% nationally. Working the other way, modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas resides in the top 17% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 30548, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 79.3 ± 1.7 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.0%22.3–25.8
High blood pressure among adults33.0%30.8–35.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.3–8.3
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.8–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%5.0–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Depression among adults19.9%18.0–21.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.8–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%34.5–39.4
Obesity among adults31.7%28.0–35.8
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.2%9.9–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%10.3–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.6%74.8–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%75.0–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%86.3–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%62.5–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%61.7–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.5%69.0–77.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%14.5–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.5%11.2–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.1%20.7–25.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%32.9–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%15.2–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.9–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.5–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%12.0–14.2
Any disability among adults26.4%24.1–28.7
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.6–7.7
Mobility disability among adults11.3%10.3–12.3
Self-care disability among adults3.2%3.0–3.4
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.9–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%19.7–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%11.0–13.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.8–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.3–7.6
Loneliness among adults35.6%32.6–38.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6412.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)8.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)38.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle1.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription97.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate79.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population11.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households48.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$118,034$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$411,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$2,061$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured