Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30548

in Hoschton, GeorgiaPopulation 26,232

60.39/ 100

Ranked #4,557 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.3%)

Ranked #68 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 9.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

96.4%

in the top 12.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$111,257

in the top 12.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

11.7%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

5.2%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.7%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

9.8%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.7%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.6 pCi/L

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Hoschton, Georgia (ZIP 30548) ranks in the top 14.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,557th) and the top 9.6% of Georgia (68th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: modeled energy burden lies in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription sits in the top 12.5% nationally, modeled arsenic is in the bottom 13.0% nationally, and household income settles in the top 12.8% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability resides in the bottom 15% nationally, utility shutoff registers in the bottom 16% nationally, and obesity rests in the bottom 17% nationally. Modeled transportation stands in the bottom 17% nationally. Set against that, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 4.5% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Close by, ZIP 30019, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.9 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $111,257 predicts 80.5 years — 1.6 years below.

    Ranked #1,944 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 78.9 ± 1.4 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%25.3–28.9
High blood pressure among adults35.6%33.4–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.3–10.5
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.6–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.8–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Depression among adults18.9%17.2–20.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%10.4–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%37.4–42.2
Obesity among adults30.0%26.6–33.8
Stroke among adults3.2%3.0–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.9%8.6–11.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.8–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%78.2–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%77.2–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%88.4–90.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%65.4–70.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.1%65.0–69.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%70.9–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.5–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.1%20.0–24.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%31.0–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.7%14.4–17.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%13.5–15.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%11.4–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.8–12.8
Any disability among adults26.5%24.4–28.8
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.5–7.6
Independent living disability among adults6.7%6.2–7.3
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.9–13.0
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.7–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%18.3–22.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.7–9.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Loneliness among adults33.8%31.0–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6413.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)7.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription96.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate88.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population10.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households53.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+20.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age42.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$111,257$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$460,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,603$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured