Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30318

in Atlanta, GeorgiaPopulation 59,609

56.75/ 100

Ranked #7,504 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #113 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #77 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,455 units

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

10 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

27.7%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.7%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.9%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

14.2%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.5%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 30318, one of several in Atlanta, Georgia sits in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,504th) and the top 16% of Georgia (113th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 0.7% nationally, transit registers in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol lands in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Modeled hearing disability resides in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 3.0% nationally. On the other hand, distance to a Superfund site settles at the national minimum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled loneliness is in the top 3.8% nationally, and transportation noise rests in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 5.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. ZIP 30305, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 6.4 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 94.5 (top 10%) — 88 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,761 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults16.0%14.4–17.7
High blood pressure among adults29.1%26.7–31.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Depression among adults18.2%15.9–20.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.6–10.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened27.7%25.2–30.5
Obesity among adults29.0%25.3–33.1
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.5%18.4–24.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.7%10.4–13.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.1%67.5–72.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.2%71.0–77.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.4%81.4–85.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%59.2–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.4%55.6–61.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%71.5–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.6–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.0%18.5–23.6
Short sleep duration among adults42.5%38.5–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%16.0–19.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%16.1–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults10.6%9.4–11.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.8–15.9
Any disability among adults26.0%23.4–28.9
Hearing disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Mobility disability among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
Vision disability among adults5.4%5.0–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.8%22.6–28.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.1%17.8–22.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.2–18.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%15.1–19.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.3–12.7
Loneliness among adults40.2%36.1–44.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6414.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)7.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)56.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle14.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription93.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate41.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population8.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households35.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+10.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age32.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$83,116$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$430,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,722$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured