Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30309

in Atlanta, GeorgiaPopulation 32,479

69.90/ 100

Ranked #610 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.0%)

Ranked #18 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 2.6%)

Ranked #18 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (top 8.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Physician access

5.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

2.9%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

5.5%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

22.8%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

22.9%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

28.3%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.6%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.5%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

5.9%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 30309, one of several in Atlanta, Georgia lands in the top 2.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (610th) and the top 2.6% of Georgia (18th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: physicians is in the top 1.1% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and modeled mobility disability lands in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lies in the bottom 1.9% nationally, obesity stands in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and high cholesterol rests in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Modeled stroke registers in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and hearing disability resides in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Dental providers settles in the top 1.9% nationally, and modeled diabetes is in the bottom 1.5% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. On the overall standing, ZIP 30305, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.7%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 9.7 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 98.9 (top 10%) — 89 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,826 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults14.1%12.6–15.7
High blood pressure among adults22.8%20.6–25.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Current asthma among adults8.3%7.4–9.4
Coronary heart disease among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
Depression among adults18.6%16.3–21.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults5.9%5.2–6.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened28.3%25.8–31.2
Obesity among adults22.9%19.7–26.6
Stroke among adults1.6%1.5–1.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.4%4.4–6.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.7–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure67.2%64.2–70.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.8%69.6–76.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.4–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%66.5–74.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.5%67.8–73.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.6%75.1–85.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.1%18.3–24.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.8%5.9–7.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults13.2%11.3–15.2
Short sleep duration among adults35.3%31.5–39.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.4%9.2–11.8
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%13.1–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Any disability among adults18.4%16.2–20.8
Hearing disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Independent living disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Mobility disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.3
Self-care disability among adults1.8%1.6–1.9
Vision disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.9–22.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.2–9.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%5.0–6.4
Loneliness among adults35.0%31.1–38.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.5–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)2.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)82.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle8.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription95.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate43.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population15.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households69.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+9.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age32.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$114,072$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$432,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$2,195$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured