Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30312

in Atlanta, GeorgiaPopulation 26,942

58.60/ 100

Ranked #5,899 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #91 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 12.8%)

Ranked #67 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,132 units

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

4.3%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

220 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

28.8%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.8%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

19.4%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

6.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

35%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.0%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 30312, one of several in Atlanta, Georgia lands in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,899th) and the top 12.8% of Georgia (91st).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 1.1% nationally, and walkability is in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and hearing disability settles in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Transit lies in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Against that, modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 1.9% nationally, modeled transportation noise registers in the top 2.6% nationally, and homeownership sits in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 4.5% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 30306, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 96%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 10.8; chronic-disease standing 94.2 (top 10%) — 83 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,442 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults16.8%15.2–18.7
High blood pressure among adults29.2%26.8–31.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults4.0%3.6–4.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Depression among adults19.4%17.1–22.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened28.8%26.3–31.7
Obesity among adults29.3%25.7–33.4
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.3%14.8–20.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%9.6–12.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.0%68.4–73.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.3%71.2–77.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.9–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.5%60.3–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.5%57.6–63.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.6%72.7–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%16.2–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.3%9.9–12.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.1%17.7–22.6
Short sleep duration among adults41.2%37.3–45.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.3%15.6–19.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.9–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults10.7%9.6–11.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.4–15.3
Any disability among adults25.2%22.7–27.9
Hearing disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Mobility disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.3
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.4–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.8%16.8–20.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.4–18.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.4–18.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.9–12.2
Loneliness among adults37.9%33.9–41.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.3–12.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–648.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)7.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)65.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle19.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate35.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population10.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households52.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+12.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age33.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$82,779$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$530,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,673$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured