Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30315

in Atlanta, GeorgiaPopulation 34,264

39.52/ 100

Ranked #27,074 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #583 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #205 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (bottom 0.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

49.4%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

2,241 units

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

31.2%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.7%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

22.2%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

29.8%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.2%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

41.7%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

19.7%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 30315, one of several in Atlanta, Georgia comes out in the bottom 16% nationally (27,074th) and the bottom 18% of Georgia (583rd).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled short sleep settles in the top 0.5% nationally, tooth loss registers in the top 2.5% nationally, and self-care disability stands in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the top 1.6% nationally, housing insecurity is in the top 1.8% nationally, and vision disability resides in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled loneliness rests in the top 2.2% nationally, and transportation lies in the top 2.3% nationally. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 0.3% nationally, and transit settles in the top 0.8% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 30288, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.5%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.3 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $50,822 predicts 77.4 years — 5.1 years below.

    Ranked #5,571 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.3 ± 1.1 years. The 34 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.5 years — 4.3 years below them.

    Ranked #3,128 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 72.3 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.8%21.6–26.2
High blood pressure among adults43.3%40.3–46.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%6.0–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Depression among adults18.1%15.8–20.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.3%15.6–19.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.6%30.7–36.7
Obesity among adults39.4%35.0–44.1
Stroke among adults5.1%4.8–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years31.2%27.2–35.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.2%17.1–21.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.4%73.9–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.6%74.7–80.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%80.9–84.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.1%55.8–64.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.2%42.2–48.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%70.9–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.5–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.9%17.6–22.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.5%30.0–37.1
Short sleep duration among adults49.4%45.3–53.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.6%27.8–33.3
Frequent mental distress among adults20.6%18.6–22.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.5–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.3%17.3–21.3
Any disability among adults37.5%34.1–41.0
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Independent living disability among adults13.7%12.4–15.1
Mobility disability among adults19.2%17.3–21.2
Self-care disability among adults7.7%7.1–8.4
Vision disability among adults10.2%9.3–11.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.7%27.1–34.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults37.4%33.8–40.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults37.1%33.7–40.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.8%26.7–32.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.7%17.7–21.6
Loneliness among adults41.7%37.5–45.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults22.2%19.9–24.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6422.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)17.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)10.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle20.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription84.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate43.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population5.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households30.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+13.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$50,822$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$317,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,124$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.3 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 72.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured