Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33313

in Lauderhill, FloridaPopulation 62,807

42.36/ 100

Ranked #24,933 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #825 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #171 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (bottom 6.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

48.6%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

73.3%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,256 units

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

60.1%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.2%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.5%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.1%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.4%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.0%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Lauderhill, Florida (ZIP 33313) comes out in the bottom 22% nationally (24,933rd) and the bottom 15% of Florida (825th).

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled short sleep resides in the top 0.7% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 0.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled vision disability sits in the top 4.5% nationally, self-care disability settles in the top 4.7% nationally, and uninsured registers in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled independent living disability stands in the top 6.4% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 6.8% nationally. More positively, subsidized affordable housing is in the top 0.9% nationally, and modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 4.3% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 33317, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.6 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $46,305 predicts 77.0 years — 1.5 years below.

    Ranked #1,817 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.6 ± 1.2 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.9 years — 4.4 years below them.

    Ranked #3,171 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.7%23.0–28.3
High blood pressure among adults44.1%40.5–47.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Depression among adults16.6%14.1–19.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.8%15.8–19.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.5–39.6
Obesity among adults39.3%33.6–45.0
Stroke among adults5.4%5.0–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.6%19.3–26.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.5%16.2–20.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.4–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.8–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.9%82.1–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%55.9–65.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.1%41.9–48.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.1%69.7–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.4%9.4–13.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.2%16.8–21.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.5%31.1–39.6
Short sleep duration among adults48.6%43.7–53.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.9%26.9–32.8
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%18.8–23.2
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%15.3–18.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.7–20.6
Any disability among adults37.1%33.1–40.9
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Independent living disability among adults13.1%11.8–14.3
Mobility disability among adults21.0%18.8–23.2
Self-care disability among adults7.3%6.7–7.9
Vision disability among adults10.2%9.4–11.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6423.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)15.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)8.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle12.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)60.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate45.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population40.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households31.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+14.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age36.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$46,305$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$256,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,683$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.6 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured