Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30288

in Conley, GeorgiaPopulation 8,116

43.95/ 100

Ranked #23,464 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #449 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #193 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (bottom 6.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

48.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

42.3%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

26.3%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

18.6%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

48.7%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.8%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

16.2%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

31.4%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.8%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Conley, Georgia (ZIP 30288), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 27% nationally (23,464th) and the bottom 37% of Georgia (449th).

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: modeled transportation noise settles in the top 0.5% nationally, loneliness stands in the top 1.7% nationally, and housing insecurity is in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 3.4% nationally, housing-cost burden sits in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled short sleep registers in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 4.5% nationally, and transportation resides in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lies in the top 5.2% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 6.8% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 30294, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.6 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $51,511 predicts 77.5 years — 3.8 years below.

    Ranked #4,950 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.6 ± 1.5 years. The 36 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.0 years — 2.3 years below them.

    Ranked #1,798 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 73.6 ± 1.5 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.5%22.6–26.5
High blood pressure among adults44.3%41.7–46.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.7–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.8–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Depression among adults17.0%15.2–19.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.7%16.2–19.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%33.2–38.2
Obesity among adults43.3%39.4–47.3
Stroke among adults4.8%4.5–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.1%19.5–24.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.1%14.9–19.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%77.0–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%78.4–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%85.0–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.7%62.4–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.7%49.0–54.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.5%76.3–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%15.0–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%29.1–35.4
Short sleep duration among adults43.8%40.3–47.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.7%24.2–29.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%17.1–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%14.1–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%15.5–18.8
Any disability among adults33.5%30.6–36.4
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.8–13.1
Mobility disability among adults18.2%16.4–20.0
Self-care disability among adults6.8%6.2–7.4
Vision disability among adults8.8%8.0–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.6%27.6–33.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.4%28.4–34.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults28.8%25.8–31.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.3%23.8–29.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.6–17.9
Loneliness among adults42.3%38.8–45.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.6%16.7–20.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6423.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)14.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)10.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription89.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate76.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population16.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households43.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+16.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$51,511$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$237,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,302$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.6 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 73.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured