Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10454

in Bronx, New YorkPopulation 39,570

33.84/ 100

Ranked #29,793 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.1%)

Ranked #1,720 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 0.6%)

Ranked #852 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 0.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Vision disability

14.9%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

40.9%

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.7%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

51.4%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

38.7%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

2,143 units

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

75%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.6%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

22.7%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

23.7%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 10454, one of several in Bronx, New York, by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 7.1% nationally (29,793rd) and the bottom 0.6% of New York (1,720th).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled vision disability sits in the top 0.5% nationally, housing insecurity settles in the top 0.01% nationally, and self-care disability registers in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled food insecurity stands in the top 0.2% nationally, modeled fair or poor health lands in the top 1.0% nationally, and households without a vehicle is in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled independent living disability resides in the top 2.0% nationally, and uninsured rests in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled transportation lies in the top 0.9% nationally. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 0.3% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, subsidized affordable housing runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 10035, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.9 ± 1.1 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.8 years — 5.9 years below them.

    Ranked #3,533 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 74.9 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.4%20.5–24.3
High blood pressure among adults36.2%33.7–38.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.3–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.7–9.3
Depression among adults17.8%15.7–19.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.0%16.4–19.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%34.0–39.1
Obesity among adults37.7%34.0–41.4
Stroke among adults4.8%4.5–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.1%25.0–33.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years22.7%20.1–25.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.0%70.7–75.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%77.0–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults82.4%80.5–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.4%52.4–60.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults41.7%38.9–44.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%67.2–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%12.2–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%15.5–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults46.1%42.8–49.5
Short sleep duration among adults45.3%41.6–48.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults38.7%36.0–41.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.8–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults20.4%18.6–22.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.7%19.8–23.7
Any disability among adults43.1%40.0–46.3
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Independent living disability among adults15.6%14.3–17.1
Mobility disability among adults25.2%23.3–27.2
Self-care disability among adults9.7%8.9–10.4
Vision disability among adults14.9%13.9–16.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults36.3%33.1–39.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults51.4%48.1–54.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults47.6%44.4–51.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults40.9%37.8–44.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults23.7%21.6–26.0
Loneliness among adults42.9%39.4–46.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults24.0%21.8–26.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate45.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6413.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)38.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)18.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle75.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription80.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)56.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate6.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)14.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population29.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households27.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+13.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age34.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$24,086$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$792,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,028$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.9 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured