Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08104

in Camden, New JerseyPopulation 22,148

33.53/ 100

Ranked #29,890 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.8%)

Ranked #580 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 0.6%)

Ranked #339 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (bottom 6.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

50.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.8%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

2,077 units

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

35.1%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

23.2%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.3%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

44.2%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

29.7%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

23.7%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

21.5%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Overall, ZIP 08104, one of several in Camden, New Jersey lands in the bottom 6.8% nationally (29,890th) and the bottom 0.6% of New Jersey (580th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled short sleep sits in the top 0.2% nationally, and vision disability is in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity settles in the top 0.4% nationally, and uninsured resides in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled self-care disability registers in the top 2.3% nationally, food insecurity rests in the top 1.1% nationally, and tooth loss stands in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lies in the top 1.2% nationally, and transportation lands in the top 1.6% nationally. More encouragingly, subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 0.3% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 08030, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.9%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 1.0%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.4%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 1.0%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.2 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $38,170 predicts 76.3 years — 5.0 years below.

    Ranked #5,559 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.2 ± 1.7 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.6 years — 5.4 years below them.

    Ranked #3,454 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.3%21.9–26.6
High blood pressure among adults40.6%37.4–43.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Depression among adults17.8%15.4–20.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.9%16.0–19.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%32.7–39.0
Obesity among adults42.3%37.1–47.4
Stroke among adults5.1%4.7–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.7%25.8–34.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years23.2%20.4–26.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.1%72.5–77.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%74.3–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults83.6%81.6–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.5%50.1–59.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults40.1%37.1–43.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%65.9–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.3%11.3–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.3%18.9–23.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults42.3%38.2–46.3
Short sleep duration among adults50.7%46.1–55.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.3%30.3–36.4
Frequent mental distress among adults21.6%19.5–23.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.5%16.7–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.0%18.9–23.1
Any disability among adults39.8%36.2–43.5
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Independent living disability among adults14.2%12.8–15.6
Mobility disability among adults20.5%18.4–22.6
Self-care disability among adults8.3%7.7–9.0
Vision disability among adults11.8%10.9–12.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.6%29.1–36.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults44.2%40.6–48.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults37.9%34.5–41.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.1%31.9–38.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults21.5%19.5–23.8
Loneliness among adults40.0%36.0–44.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults23.7%21.3–26.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate30.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–6412.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)19.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)18.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle34.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription85.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)51.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate30.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population10.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households21.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+10.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age33.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$38,170$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$93,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,163$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.2 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 71.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured