Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27974

in Shiloh, North CarolinaPopulation 858

54.18/ 100

Ranked #10,467 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #246 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #54 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

69.8%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

21.2 mi

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.4%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

3.0%

in the top 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.53%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

14.9%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Shiloh, North Carolina (ZIP 27974) places in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,467th) and the top 31% of North Carolina (246th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Poverty rests in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and homeownership resides in the top 9.5% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, floodplain exposure lands in the top 1.7% nationally, walkability stands in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and distance to an emergency room registers in the top 4.7% nationally. Lead in tap water settles in the top 10.5% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 11.1% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 27921, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.9%26.8–31.1
High blood pressure among adults35.8%33.4–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.2–9.5
Current asthma among adults11.0%10.1–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.1–8.5
Depression among adults25.9%23.5–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%10.0–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%34.4–39.3
Obesity among adults34.7%30.8–38.7
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.6%9.3–14.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.3–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%75.8–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%78.0–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%85.9–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.1%65.0–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.2%62.3–69.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%69.7–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%13.7–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%10.9–15.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.1%19.0–25.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%25.8–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.3%15.0–20.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.2–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%11.3–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.7–16.7
Any disability among adults31.4%28.1–34.9
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.8–9.0
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.9–15.6
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.8–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.6–14.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.1–11.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.0–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.9
Loneliness among adults31.8%28.9–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6415.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription81.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate94.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households74.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+25.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age54.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$80,395$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$228,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 1.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.56 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured