Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27923

in Coinjock, North CarolinaPopulation 745

50.65/ 100

Ranked #15,344 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #370 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #91 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dental provider access

3.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

97.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

25.3 mi

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

14.5 mi

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.4%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US18th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.41%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US19th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Coinjock, North Carolina (ZIP 27923) sits in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,344th) and the top 47% of North Carolina (370th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: dental providers rests in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 11.5% nationally, and radon resides in the bottom 8.6% nationally. Working the other way, floodplain exposure lies in the top 0.4% nationally, and walkability settles in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands in the top 3.0% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center rests in the top 12.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, dental providers runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 27916, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%26.6–34.0
High blood pressure among adults37.0%32.5–41.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.5–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%6.9–9.8
Depression among adults26.2%22.2–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.0–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.0–42.5
Obesity among adults35.5%27.3–44.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.1%11.5–17.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%6.6–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%74.3–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%76.3–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.1–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.3%57.3–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.6%64.0–71.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%67.9–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%12.6–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.3%12.1–18.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.0%19.2–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%24.2–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%15.7–22.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.5–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%11.7–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%12.7–17.7
Any disability among adults33.1%28.1–38.6
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.5
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.0–9.7
Mobility disability among adults14.8%12.3–17.5
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.3–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.6%17.0–24.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.3–14.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.4–12.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.6–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.7–8.1
Loneliness among adults30.4%25.3–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.2–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6437.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)18.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription85.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate76.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population23.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households51.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+23.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age43.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$69,289$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$291,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,600$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 1.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured