Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27927

in Corolla, North CarolinaPopulation 1,199

63.80/ 100

Ranked #2,577 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.1%)

Ranked #52 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 6.6%)

Ranked #7 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (top 5.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

4.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

4.9%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

25.4%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

88.2%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.2%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

3.8%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

5.9%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

76.9%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Corolla, North Carolina (ZIP 27927) stands in the top 8.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,577th) and the top 6.6% of North Carolina (52nd).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: grocery settles in the top 0.2% nationally, and recreation rests in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and loneliness settles in the bottom 0.6% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the bottom 0.9% nationally, transportation lands in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and food insecurity settles in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Fatal road crashes rests at the national minimum, and modeled colon screening lands in the top 1.2% nationally. On the other side, floodplain exposure settles in the top 0.7% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 27949, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%28.3–37.1
High blood pressure among adults39.3%34.4–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.7%11.3–14.1
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.2–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.1–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%4.6–8.1
Depression among adults21.4%18.0–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.3–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.2%37.1–47.3
Obesity among adults30.8%23.2–39.4
Stroke among adults3.4%2.8–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.7%7.6–11.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.0–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.8%79.4–85.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.3%81.1–87.1
Cholesterol screening among adults93.1%91.7–94.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years76.9%72.5–80.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.8%68.4–75.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%68.3–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.1–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.7%5.9–11.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.9%13.4–23.1
Short sleep duration among adults28.9%22.8–35.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.5%10.3–16.8
Frequent mental distress among adults11.5%9.6–13.5
Frequent physical distress among adults10.9%8.8–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.5%7.5–11.5
Any disability among adults26.8%21.7–32.1
Hearing disability among adults8.2%6.9–9.7
Independent living disability among adults5.3%4.1–6.5
Mobility disability among adults12.1%9.3–15.1
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.1–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.4%2.7–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults16.2%13.1–19.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.2–8.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.0%2.7–5.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults4.9%3.7–6.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.0–4.7
Loneliness among adults25.4%20.8–30.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.2%2.6–4.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–648.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)64.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription94.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate90.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population7.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households95.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+42.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age63.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$120,568$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$714,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured